from Judy's notebook
|
method
|
how it works | when to use it | when not to use it |
| denial
or withdrawal |
person tries to solve problem
by denying its existence - results in win/lose |
issue is relatively unimportant;
timing is wrong; cooling-off period is needed; short term use |
issue is important;
issue will not disappear, but build |
| suppression or
smoothing over |
differences are played down;
surface harmony is emphasized; results in win/lose; leads to resentment and possible sabotage if issue remains suppressed |
issue is relatively unimportant;
preservation of the relationship is primary; timing is wrong; cooling-off period is needed |
issue is important;
others are ready and willing to work on the issue |
| power
or dominance |
decision by majority rule or by
person in authority; results in win/lose and resentment by the loser |
when this method has been
agreed upon in advance, process is seen as fair; authority is respected and trusted |
losers feel unheard
ignored, or disrespected |
| compromise
or negotiation |
each party gives up something
in order to meet halfway. results in win/lose if "middle of the road position ignores the real diversity of needs or viewpoints |
all parties have enough
leeway to give; they trust and respect each other; resources are limited |
issues of deeply-held
principle rather than material interests; parties are not fully committed to the relationship |
| collaboration | abilities, values and expertise of
all are recognized; each party's position is clear, but the emphasis is on group solution. results in win/win for all |
there is enough time available
to complete the process; parties are committed to relationship and process; and trained in use of process |
when time, abilities,
commitment and/or trust are not present |
to learn more, read:
or visit:Avruch, Kenneth, et. al., eds. Conflict Resolution: Cross-Cultural Perspectives Westport, CT: Praeger, 1991 Coover, Virginia, et. al. Resource Manual for a Living Revolution Philadelphia: New Society, 1985
(see part 2: "Working in Groups" pp. 43-99.)Fisher, Roger and William Ury Getting to Yes NY: Penguin, 1981 Gastil, John Democracy in Small Groups Philadelphia: New Society, 1993 Kaner, Sam, et. al. Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision Making Philadelphia: New Society, 1996
The Conflict Resolution Information Source
go back to
The address of this page is http://www.draknet.com/proteus/conflict2.htm
Contents of this page are taken from Judy's counseling
notebook: original author is not known.